SULLIVAN COUNTY, Ind. — Delphi murders suspect Richard Allen has been moved to a different prison.
According to court documents filed Wednesday, Allen, charged with murder in the 2017 killings of Liberty German and Abigail Williams, was transferred from the Westville Correctional Facility in LaPorte County to the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility in Sullivan County on Dec. 6.
In April 2023, Allen's previous attorneys filed a motion requesting he be moved to a new prison. At that point, Allen had been held at the Westville Correctional Facility for around six months.
In that filing, Allen's attorneys described his conditions as "akin to those of a prisoner of war." They laid out a list of treatment Allen had allegedly experienced:
- Allen's cell being 6 feet by 10 feet in size
- Him sleeping on a pad on a concrete floor
- Only allowed to shower one to two times per week
- Required to wear the same clothes, including underwear, for days that are soiled, stained, tattered and torn
- No opportunity for Allen to visit his wife or family members in the past five months
- The electronic tablet he uses to call family members is monitored by prison officials, and the cost of the calls are being borne by Allen and his family.
- Allen is afforded very little recreational time.
- Information Allen's attorneys provided to him to review as part of his defense on March 24 are yet to be provided to him, as of April 3.
- It is difficult for his attorneys to meet with him given his segregation and isolation, which keeps him from being able to assist in his defense.
At the time, Allen was one of 22 people housed pre-trial with the Indiana Department of Correction.
In a meeting in early April, his attorneys claimed Allen seemed to be suffering from memory loss and an overall inability to communicate rationally with his attorneys and family members.
Allen's attorneys urge Indiana Supreme Court to take action
Earlier this month, attorneys for Allen issued a forceful response to the Indiana Supreme Court, urging the court to remove the judge in the Delphi case and reinstate his original attorneys.
They're also calling for his trial within 70 days of the court's ruling.
In this filing, the attorneys claim:
- Judge Frances Gull severed Allen's attorney-client relationship "on (her own) motion" and over Allen's objection.
- Not a single Indiana case has tolerated similar behavior from a trial judge.
- Allen repeatedly asked to keep his original attorneys, but the judge acted anyway.
- The judge's actions delayed him having a speedy trial.
- Appealing is not an option because Allen cannot have a speedy trial without his original attorneys.
"This writ is the only remedy. Any trial without Baldwin and Rozzi, Rick’s counsel of choice, would be merely for show. Only two lawyers can be ready for a speedy trial and carry out Rick’s well-developed trial strategy. And only one court can grant that relief: this Court. If action is not taken now, Rick’s trial will be delayed longer and even more public resources will be spent. But more importantly, the public’s trust in the judiciary will be permanently undermined while the world watches. An appeal is inadequate," Allen's attorneys wrote.
Judge Gull's argument
The judge in the Delphi murders case and Indiana Attorney General's Office argued the Indiana Supreme Court should not grant Allen's request to reinstate his original defense team and remove the judge.
In her argument, Gull claims she made her decision to remove Allen's original defense team for gross negligence and because she believes they compromised his defense. She claims an argument against her decision was never made in the trial court. Additionally, she said if it had and she had made a ruling, Allen's attorneys could then have appealed her ruling, instead of going directly to the supreme court in this case.
Gull argues Allen's right to choose attorneys Andrew Baldwin and Bradley Rozzi to represent him is outweighed by his right to effective assistance of counsel.
"Respondent acted well within her discretion to remove Baldwin and Rozzi over Relator’s objections. The record supports that the trial court could reasonably conclude Baldwin and Rozzi committed multiple violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, compromised Relator’s defense, and that “the totality of the circumstances demonstrate[d] gross negligence and incompetence on the part of the defense team,” she wrote.
She argues the request to have a trial within 70 days of the Indiana Supreme Court's decision should not be granted, as Allen's current defense team asked for the trial to be pushed back to October 2024.
Attorney general's argument
In its argument, the attorney general's office said Allen's attorneys' claims were not clearly presented to the trial court and seeking an appeal court decision on it would be inadequate. Essentially, there are other steps to be taken before requesting the Indiana Supreme Court to make a decision.
The AG argues Allen's original defense attorneys, Baldwin and Rozzi, could have argued against possible removal at an Oct. 19 hearing, instead stating in the judge's chambers they would withdraw under accusations of negligence and incompetence, including an evidence leak.
Additionally, when Baldwin and Rozzi tried to appear as Allen's attorneys at an Oct. 31 hearing, neither provided additional evidence or arguments to rebut the court's allegations, the attorney general claims.
"The court’s discretionary decision could be reviewed on appeal with a complete record, but the limited review in this action is inappropriate," the AG's office argues.
Allen's civil attorneys' calls for the judge's removal and a trial within 70 days of the Indiana Supreme Court's decision, is inappropriate as it would keep the judge or a replacement judge from holding possibly necessary hearings before trial, the AG states. Additionally, Allen's civil attorneys have not presented their requests to the trial court, which would allow them to appeal if they disagree with the ruling.
RELATED: Richard Allen's attorneys tell Indiana Supreme Court Delphi judge still 'wrong' in handling of case
Allen is accused of killing Abigail Williams, 13, and Liberty German, 14, in February 2017.
In an Oct. 31 hearing, Gull told Allen, "I cannot and will not allow these attorneys to represent you." She then disqualified Baldwin and Rozzi from representing him – even pro bono. Gull said Baldwin and Rozzi engaged in "gross negligence," which they said, "that's the court's opinion."
"I'm sorry that this has happened, Mr. Allen," Gull said at the Oct. 31 hearing.
Allen's recently-appointed public defenders, William S. Lebrato and Robert C. Scremin, asked the judge to push his trial back. It was originally set for Jan. 24, 2024, but is now set for Oct. 15-31, 2024.